Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

"The side effects of the treatment can be horrendous and heartbreaking for both patients and their loved ones, all in the name of trustworthy medical treatment. Although the drug treatment comes with the promise to improve the patient’s quality of life, it is just common sense that a drug that makes them throw up and lose their hair, while wrecking their immune system, is doing the exact opposite. "

Former White House press secretary Tony Snow died in July 2008 at the
age of 53, following a series of chemotherapy treatments for colon
cancer. In 2005, Snow had his colon removed and underwent six months
of chemotherapy after being diagnosed with colon cancer. Two years
later (2007), Snow underwent surgery to remove a growth in his
abdominal area, near the site of the original cancer. "This is a very
treatable condition," said Dr. Allyson Ocean, a gastrointestinal
oncologist at Weill Cornell Medical College. "Many patients, because
of the therapies we have, are able to work and live full lives with
quality while they're being treated. Anyone who looks at this as a
death sentence is wrong." But of course we now know, Dr. Ocean was
dead wrong.

The media headlines proclaimed Snow died from colon cancer, although
they knew he didn't have a colon anymore. Apparently, the malignant
cancer had "returned" (from where?) and "spread" to the liver and
elsewhere in his body. In actual fact, the colon surgery severely
restricted his normal eliminative functions, thereby overburdening
the liver and tissue fluids with toxic waste. The previous series of
chemo-treatments inflamed and irreversibly damaged a large number of
cells in his body, and also impaired his immune system -- a perfect
recipe for growing new cancers. Now unable to heal the causes of the
original cancer (in addition to the newly created ones), Snow's body
developed new cancers in the liver and other parts of the body.

The mainstream media, of course, still insist Snow died from colon
cancer, thus perpetuating the myth that it is only the cancer that
kills people, not the treatment. Nobody seems to raise the important
point that it is extremely difficult for a cancer patient to actually
heal from this condition while being subjected to the systemic
poisons of chemotherapy and deadly radiation. If you are bitten by a
poisonous snake and don't get an antidote for it, isn't it likely
that your body becomes overwhelmed by the poison and, therefore,
cannot function anymore?

Before Tony Snow began his chemo-treatments for his second colon
cancer, he still looked healthy and strong. But after a few weeks
into his treatment, he started to develop a coarse voice, looked
frail, turned gray and lost his hair. Did the cancer do all this to
him? Certainly not. Cancer doesn't do such a thing, but chemical
poisoning does. He actually looked more ill than someone who has been
bitten by a poisonous snake.

Does the mainstream media ever report about the overwhelming
scientific evidence that shows chemotherapy has zero benefits in the
five-year survival rate of colon cancer patients? Or how many
oncologists stand up for their cancer patients and protect them
against chemotherapy treatment which they very well know can cause
them to die far more quickly than if they received no treatment at
all? Can you trustingly place your life into their hands when you
know that most of them would not even consider chemotherapy for
themselves if they were diagnosed with cancer? What do they know that
you don't? The news is spreading fast that in the United States
physician-caused fatalities now exceed 750,000 each year. Perhaps,
many doctors no longer trust in what they practice, for good reasons.

"Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy...
Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This
fact has been documented for over a decade. Yet doctors still use
chemotherapy for these tumors... Women with breast cancer are likely
to die faster with chemo than without it." - Alan Levin, M.D.

An investigation by the Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern
Sydney Cancer Centre, Australia, into the contribution of
chemotherapy to 5-year survival in 22 major adult malignancies,
showed startling results: The overall contribution of curative and
adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was
estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA." [Royal North
Shore Hospital Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2005 Jun;17(4):294.]

The research covered data from the Cancer Registry in Australia and
the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results in the USA for the year
1998. The current 5-year relative adult survival rate for cancer in
Australia is over 60%, and no less than that in the USA. By
comparison, a mere 2.3% contribution of chemotherapy to cancer
survival does not justify the massive expense involved and the
tremendous suffering patients experience because of severe, toxic
side effects resulting from this treatment. With a meager success
rate of 2.3%, selling chemotherapy as a medical treatment (instead of
a scam), is one of the greatest fraudulent acts ever committed. The
average chemotherapy earns the medical establishment a whopping
$300,000 to $1,000,000 each year, and has so far earned those who
promote this pseudo-medication (poison) over 1 trillion dollars. It's
no surprise that the medical establishment tries to keep this scam
alive for as long as possible.

"Abel’s epidemiological study, which was published on August 10, 1991 in The Lancet, should have alerted every doctor and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most common treatments used for cancer and other diseases. In his paper, Abel came to the conclusion that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was “appalling.”"

In 1990, the highly respected German epidemiologist, Dr. Ulrich Abel
from the Tumor Clinic of the University of Heidelberg, conducted the
most comprehensive investigation of every major clinical study on
chemotherapy drugs ever done. Abel contacted 350 medical centers and
asked them to send him anything they had ever published on
chemotherapy. He also reviewed and analyzed thousands of scientific
articles published in the most prestigious medical journals. It took
Abel several years to collect and evaluate the data. Abel's
epidemiological study, which was published on August 10, 1991 in The
Lancet, should have alerted every doctor and cancer patient about the
risks of one of the most common treatments used for cancer and other
diseases. In his paper, Abel came to the conclusion that the overall
success rate of chemotherapy was "appalling." According to this
report, there was no scientific evidence available in any existing
study to show that chemotherapy can "extend in any appreciable way
the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers."

Abel points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of
life. He describes chemotherapy as "a scientific wasteland" and
states that even though there is no scientific evidence that
chemotherapy works, neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up
on it. The mainstream media has never reported on this hugely
important study, which is hardly surprising, given the enormous
vested interests of the groups that sponsor the media, that is, the
pharmaceutical companies. A recent search turned up exactly zero
reviews of Abel's work in American journals, even though it was
published in 1990. I believe this is not because his work was
unimportant -- but because it is irrefutable.

The truth of the matter would be far too costly for the
pharmaceutical industry to bear, thus making it unacceptable. If the
mass media reported the truth that medical drugs, including
chemotherapy drugs, are used to practically commit genocide in the
U.S. and the world, their best sponsors (the pharmaceutical
companies) would have to withdraw their misleading advertisements
from the television media, radio stations, magazines, and newspapers.
But neither group wants to go bankrupt.

Many doctors go as far as prescribing chemotherapy drugs to patients
for malignancies that are far too advanced for surgery, with the full
knowledge that there are no benefits at all. Yet they claim
chemotherapy to be an effective cancer treatment, and their
unsuspecting patients believe that "effective" equals "cure." The
doctors, of course, refer to the FDA's definition of an "effective"
drug, one which achieves a 50% or more reduction in tumor size for 28
days. They neglect to tell their patients that there is no
correlation whatsoever between shrinking tumors for 28 days and
curing the cancer or extending life. Temporary tumor shrinkage
through chemotherapy has never been shown to cure cancer or to extend
life. In other words, you can live with an untreated tumor for just
as long as you would with one that has been shrunken or been
eliminated by chemotherapy (or radiation).

Chemotherapy has never been shown to have curative effects for
cancer. By contrast, the body can still cure itself, which it
actually tries to do by developing cancer. Cancer is more a healing
response than it is a disease. The "disease" is the body's attempt to
cure itself of an existing imbalance. And sometimes, this healing
response continues even if a person is subjected to chemotherapy
(and/or radiation). Unfortunately, as the previously mentioned
research has demonstrated, the chances for a real cure are greatly
reduced when patients are treated with chemotherapy drugs.

The side effects of the treatment can be horrendous and heartbreaking
for both patients and their loved ones, all in the name of
trustworthy medical treatment. Although the drug treatment comes with
the promise to improve the patient's quality of life, it is just
common sense that a drug that makes them throw up and lose their
hair, while wrecking their immune system, is doing the exact
opposite. Chemo-therapy can give the patient life-threatening mouth
sores. It attacks the immune system by destroying billions of immune
cells (white blood cells). Its deadly poisons inflame every part of
the body. The drugs can slough off the entire lining of their
intestines. The most common side effect experienced among chemo
patients is their complete lack of energy. The new additional drugs
now given to many chemo patients may prevent the patient from
noticing some of the side effects, but they hardly reduce the
immensely destructive and suppressive effect of the chemotherapy
itself. Remember, the reason chemotherapy can shrink some tumors is
because it causes massive destruction in the body.

If you have cancer, you may think that feeling tired is just part of
the disease. This rarely is the case. Feeling unusually tired is more
likely due to anemia, a common side effect of most chemotherapy
drugs. Chemo drugs can dramatically decrease your red blood cell
levels, and this reduces oxygen availability to the 60-100 trillion
cells of your body. You can literally feel the energy being zapped
from every cell of your body -- a physical death without dying. Chemo-
caused fatigue has a negative impact on day-to-day activities in 89%
of all patients. With no energy, there can be no joy and no hope, and
all bodily functions become subdued.

One long-term side effect is that these patients' bodies can no
longer respond to nutritional or immune-strengthening approaches to
cancerous tumors. All of this may explain why cancer patients who do
not receive any treatment at all, have an up to four times higher
remission rate than those who receive treatment. The sad thing is
that chemotherapy does not cure 96% to 98% of all cancers anyway.
Conclusive evidence (for the majority of cancers) that chemotherapy
has any positive influence on survival or quality of life does not
exist.

To promote chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer is misleading, to
say the least. By permanently damaging the body's immune system and
other important parts, chemo-therapy has become a leading cause of
treatment-caused diseases such as heart disease, liver disease,
intestinal diseases, diseases of the immune system, infections, brain
diseases, pain disorders, and rapid aging.

Before committing themselves to being poisoned, cancer patients need
to question their doctors and ask them to produce the research or
evidence that shrinking a tumor actually translates to any increase
in survival. If they tell you that chemotherapy is your best chance
of surviving, you will know they are lying or are simply misinformed.
As Abel's research clearly demonstrated, there is no such evidence
anywhere to be found in the medical literature. Subjecting patients
to chemotherapy robs them of a fair chance of finding or responding
to a real cure and deserves criminal prosecution.

Andreas Moritz's book, Cancer is not a Disease - It's a Survival
Mechanism, explains the root causes of cancer and how to eliminate
them for good. Available through www.ener-chi.com or www.amazon.com

About the author:
Andreas Moritz is a medical intuitive; a practitioner of Ayurveda,
iridology, shiatsu, and vibrational medicine; a writer; and an
artist. He is the author of The Amazing Liver and Gallbladder Flush,
Timeless Secrets of Health and Rejuvenation, Lifting the Veil of
Duality, Cancer Is Not a Disease, It's Time to Come Alive, Heart
Disease No More, Diabetes No More, Simple Steps to Total Health,
Diabetes -- No More, Ending the AIDS Myth and Heal Yourself with
Sunlight. For more information, visit the author's website (www.ener-
chi.com).

* stat counter